Conjuring Credits

The Origins of Wonder

User Tools

Site Tools


Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
bill:breaking_a_pencil_with_a_bill [2017/06/28 14:56]
127.0.0.1 external edit
bill:breaking_a_pencil_with_a_bill [2019/09/11 17:08] (current)
stephenminch Added the Ishii Black citation.
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== Breaking a Pencil with a Bill ====== ====== Breaking a Pencil with a Bill ======
  
-This now familiar standard of beginners'​ magic texts, in which a pencil is broken in half with a blow from a folded dollar bill or bank note, was originally ​called "​Biffo"​ when it was marketed as an [[http://​askalexander.org/​display/​10001/​Pocket/​85|instruction sheet]] ​in October 1923 by the Thayer Manufacturing Co. (See //​[[http://​askalexander.org/​display/​38347/​The+Sphinx/​27 (Oct 1923)|The Sphinx]]//, Vol.22 No. 8, Oct. 1923, p. 243.) Thayer ​did not credit the trick to anyone, so it is reasonable to assume that it was the invention of Floyd Thayer or one of his staff.+This now familiar standard of beginners'​ magic texts, in which a pencil is apparently ​broken in half with a blow from a folded dollar bill or bank note, was originally ​described as being done with a pair of chop sticks and some strips of tissue paper. The trick, or at least this presentation of itwas Japanese and was described by Ishii Black in the December 1914 issue of //​[[https://​askalexander.org/​display/​10706/​The+magician+monthly/​8|The Magician Monthly]]//,​ Vol. 11 No. 1, p. 4. 
 + 
 +Almost nine years later, the Thayer Manufacturing Co. marketed ​the trick in its westernized form, using a pencil and dollar bill, as an instruction sheet, calling it "​Biffo": ​[[http://​askalexander.org/​display/​10001/​Pocket/​85|instruction sheet]]. (See //​[[http://​askalexander.org/​display/​38347/​The+Sphinx/​27 (Oct 1923)|The Sphinx]]//, Vol.22 No. 8, Oct. 1923, p. 243.) Thayer ​gave no credit ​or provenance for the trick.
  
 Within a year, B. L. Gilbert was selling it under the name of "Power of Money"​. (See //​[[http://​askalexander.org/​display/​38430/​The+Sphinx/​22|The Sphinx]]//, Vol. 23 No. 7, Sep. 1924, p. 230.) Within a year, B. L. Gilbert was selling it under the name of "Power of Money"​. (See //​[[http://​askalexander.org/​display/​38430/​The+Sphinx/​22|The Sphinx]]//, Vol. 23 No. 7, Sep. 1924, p. 230.)
Line 7: Line 9:
 "​Biffo"​ quickly moved into the public domain when it appeared in the Jan. 24, 1925 issue of the //​[[http://​fultonhistory.com/​Newspaper%205/​Brooklyn%20NY%20Daily%20Eagle/​Brooklyn%20NY%20Daily%20Eagle%201924%20Grayscale/​Brooklyn%20NY%20Daily%20Eagle%201924%20a%20Grayscale%20-%201358.pdf|Brooklyn Daily Eagle]]//, p. 5, in Thurston'​s syndicated newspaper column of tricks, ghosted by Walter Gibson. "​Biffo"​ quickly moved into the public domain when it appeared in the Jan. 24, 1925 issue of the //​[[http://​fultonhistory.com/​Newspaper%205/​Brooklyn%20NY%20Daily%20Eagle/​Brooklyn%20NY%20Daily%20Eagle%201924%20Grayscale/​Brooklyn%20NY%20Daily%20Eagle%201924%20a%20Grayscale%20-%201358.pdf|Brooklyn Daily Eagle]]//, p. 5, in Thurston'​s syndicated newspaper column of tricks, ghosted by Walter Gibson.
  
-However, the trick was still recognized ​in the magic community as being Thayer'​s in 1934, as shown in a controversy surrounding Harry Clapham'​s "​Debunking Modern Magic" column in //The Billboard//​. ​ In the Sep. 22, 1934 issue of //​[[http://​askalexander.org/​display/​67281/​Magic+and+Magicians+1934+electronic+resource/​51|The Billboard]]//,​ p. 26, Julien Proskauer, on behalf of the Society of American Magicians, accused Clapham of exposure and other matters in his columns. ​ Clapham counter-attacked in the [[http://​askalexander.org/​display/​67281/​Magic+and+Magicians+1934+electronic+resource/​52|same issue]], p. 55, by pointing out that Proskauer had, in a booklet of tricks Proskauer had written for Seagram'​s Whiskey, "​exposed item No. 56 in Thayer’s magic catalog Biffo."​ William Hilliar followed this up by reprinting a telegram from Joe Wilkes Kendall in the October 6, 1934, [[http://​askalexander.org/​display/​67281/​Magic+and+Magicians+1934+electronic+resource/​56|column]],​ p. 46, stating that Biffo had been removed from the fourth printing of the Seagram'​s booklet. (Research by Bill Mullins.)+However, the trick was still identified by many in the western ​magic community as being Thayer'​s in 1934, as shown in a controversy surrounding Harry Clapham'​s "​Debunking Modern Magic" column in //The Billboard//​. ​ In the Sep. 22, 1934 issue of //​[[http://​askalexander.org/​display/​67281/​Magic+and+Magicians+1934+electronic+resource/​51|The Billboard]]//,​ p. 26, Julien Proskauer, on behalf of the Society of American Magicians, accused Clapham of exposure and other matters in his columns. ​ Clapham counter-attacked in the [[http://​askalexander.org/​display/​67281/​Magic+and+Magicians+1934+electronic+resource/​52|same issue]], p. 55, by pointing out that Proskauer had, in a booklet of tricks Proskauer had written for Seagram'​s Whiskey, "​exposed item No. 56 in Thayer’s magic catalog Biffo."​ William Hilliar followed this up by reprinting a telegram from Joe Wilkes Kendall in the October 6, 1934, [[http://​askalexander.org/​display/​67281/​Magic+and+Magicians+1934+electronic+resource/​56|column]],​ p. 46, stating that Biffo had been removed from the fourth printing of the Seagram'​s booklet. (Research by Bill Mullins.)
  
 {{tag>​effect}} {{tag>​effect}}