Conjuring Credits

The Origins of Wonder

User Tools

Site Tools

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
cards:fusion [2022/10/25 00:31] – Added the Spring and Fulves citations. stephenminchcards:fusion [2022/10/25 18:30] – Removed several superfluous citations and moved Wesley James to the end of the chain. stephenminch
Line 7: Line 7:
 Four issues later, Karl Fulves added a note regarding Spring's effect (see //[[https://askalexander.org/display/12839/Pallbearers+Review+Vol.+5+&+6/22|The Pallbearers Review]]//, Vol. 5, No. 2, Dec. 1969, p. 308). Fulves first mentioned Houghton's trick. He then described an effect he recalled in which two chosen cards, unsigned, are returned to the deck, one face down, the other face up. When the deck is spread, the face-up selection is found fused, back to back with the face-down selection, creating a double-faced card. This trick has yet to be identified. Four issues later, Karl Fulves added a note regarding Spring's effect (see //[[https://askalexander.org/display/12839/Pallbearers+Review+Vol.+5+&+6/22|The Pallbearers Review]]//, Vol. 5, No. 2, Dec. 1969, p. 308). Fulves first mentioned Houghton's trick. He then described an effect he recalled in which two chosen cards, unsigned, are returned to the deck, one face down, the other face up. When the deck is spread, the face-up selection is found fused, back to back with the face-down selection, creating a double-faced card. This trick has yet to be identified.
  
-The next two fusion effects to involve signatures weren't presented as fusions, but rather as predictions or moveable ink---the result was the same, though; that of two signed cards becoming one. The first of these was J. G. Thompson, Jr.'s "Joint Signature" from //[[http://askalexander.org/display/12839/Pallbearers+Review+Vol+5+6/79|The Pallbearers Review]]//, Vol. 5 No. 12, Oct. 1970, p. 365. In this trick, a prediction card, signed by the performer on the back, ends up on a selection signed by its chooser on the face. The next was Karl Fulves's "Future Minus" from //[[http://askalexander.org/display/13083/The+Book+of+Numbers/39|The Book of Numbers]]//, 1971, p. 39. A red-backed prediction card fused to the initialed face of a blue-backed selection. 
- 
-Dan Tong later used signatures to reintroduce the fusion premise with "Signature" in //The Blueprint//, Vol. 1 No. 8, Feb. 1975, p. 32. Ian Baxter -- an editor of //The Blueprint//---anachronistically published his own variants of Tong's trick as "Signature Variations" in the previous month's issue, Vol. 1 No. 7, Jan. 1975, p. 27. 
- 
-Wesley James has claimed the Fusion plot as his, but he didn't publish his "Forgery" until //[[http://askalexander.org/display/14532/Stop+Fooling+Us+Lecture+Notes/46|Stop Fooling Us!]]//, 1989, p. 39. James has two cards fuse, one signed by the spectator, the other by the performer. Even if calculating by the 1965 creation date James claims for his trick (see //[[http://askalexander.org/display/12674/Enchantments|Enchantments]]//, 2004, p. 5), Houghton's fusion effect, although lacking signatures, predates it by nine years. 
  
 The open use of a double-backed card was later introduced to enhance the effect. Gene Maze, Richard Kaufman, and David Arthur used this gaffed card in their "Fusion" routine from //CardWorks//, 1981, p. 47. Strictly speaking, this isn’t a fusion routine, regardless of the title. The cards weren’t presented as fused but merely “stuck together” (which, while similar, is conceptually different). The double-backer was then split back into two cards, giving the merger no permanency. The open use of a double-backed card was later introduced to enhance the effect. Gene Maze, Richard Kaufman, and David Arthur used this gaffed card in their "Fusion" routine from //CardWorks//, 1981, p. 47. Strictly speaking, this isn’t a fusion routine, regardless of the title. The cards weren’t presented as fused but merely “stuck together” (which, while similar, is conceptually different). The double-backer was then split back into two cards, giving the merger no permanency.
Line 17: Line 12:
 1981 also saw the publication of Paul Harris and Looy Simonoff's "The Beast with Two Backs" in //Close-Up Fantasies Finalé//, 1981, p. 113. This trick ended with two cards permanently fused together in the form of a red/blue double-backer. 1981 also saw the publication of Paul Harris and Looy Simonoff's "The Beast with Two Backs" in //Close-Up Fantasies Finalé//, 1981, p. 113. This trick ended with two cards permanently fused together in the form of a red/blue double-backer.
  
-Steve Beam reinvented the idea of ending with a double-facer, publishing it as "Making Faces" in //The Trapdoor//, No. 7, Jan. 1985, p. 115. In his text, Beam claims to have been doing the routine since his college days. No signatures are involved.+The first published variation to use a double-faced card to fuse together two spectator-signed selections is "Hotfoot" by Jay Sankey, in //Sankey Panky//, 1986, p. 76.
  
-The first published variation to use a double-faced card to fuse together two spectator-signed selections is "Hotfoot" by Jay Sankey, in //Sankey Panky//, 1986, p. 76.+Wesley James has claimed the Fusion plot as his, but he didn't publish his "Forgery" until //[[http://askalexander.org/display/14532/Stop+Fooling+Us+Lecture+Notes/46|Stop Fooling Us!]]//, 1989, p. 39. James has two cards fuse, one signed by the spectator, the other by the performer. Even if calculating by the 1965 creation date James claims for his trick (see //[[http://askalexander.org/display/12674/Enchantments|Enchantments]]//, 2004, p. 5), Houghton's fusion effect, although lacking signatures, predates it by nine years.
  
 The complexity in the development of the card-fusion concept makes it a forbidding topic for succinct discussion. The citations above offer points of origin and some highlights in its evolution. To explore the subject further, refer to: The complexity in the development of the card-fusion concept makes it a forbidding topic for succinct discussion. The citations above offer points of origin and some highlights in its evolution. To explore the subject further, refer to:

Page Tools

Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Imprint & Privacy Policy