Conjuring Credits

The Origins of Wonder

User Tools

Site Tools


Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
cards:paintbrush_color_change [2017/06/28 14:57]
127.0.0.1 external edit
cards:paintbrush_color_change [2018/06/21 17:31]
stephenminch
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== Paintbrush Color Change ====== ====== Paintbrush Color Change ======
  
-This color change was the creation of Frank Ward Cloyes. It was marketed in England by Ellis Stanyon as "​Cloye'​s [sic] Colour Change,"​ 1910, and in the U.S. by Read & Covert as "The Prismatic Cards (Cloyes'​ Changing Cards),"​ 1910. It was the same technique used today, but using a double-faced card to allow cleaner displays.+This color change was the creation of Frank Ward Cloyes. It was marketed in England by Ellis Stanyon as "​Cloye'​s [sic] Colour Change,"​ 1910, and in the U.S. by Read & Covert as "The Prismatic Cards (Cloyes'​ Changing Cards),"​ 1910. It was the same technique used today, but employed ​a double-faced card to allow cleaner displays.
  
 After that, many people muddied the waters by claiming the move as their own. After that, many people muddied the waters by claiming the move as their own.
  
-The very next month after releasing ​"​Cloye'​s Colour Change"​ on the market, Stanyon taught the change in //​[[http://​askalexander.org/​display/​13139/​Stanyon+s+Serial+Lessons+in+Conjuring+In+21+Parts+1899+1910/​428|Stanyon'​s Serial Lessons in Conjuring]]//,​ No. 20, July 1910, p. 5. But in true Ellis Stanyon fashionhe not only didn't credit ​Cloyes. Insteadhe explicitly claimed credit for himself as the sleight's originator. What's even more damning to Stanyon'​s claim is that he called it "A New Colour Change"​ in the lesson itself, but accidentally still called ​it "​Cloye'​s Colour Change"​ in the advertising for the lesson (see //​[[http://​askalexander.org/​display/​16725/​Stanyon+s+Magic+Vol+10+No+10/​8|Magic]]//,​ Vol. 10 No. 10, July 1910, p. 80).+The month after "​Cloye'​s Colour Change" ​appeared ​on the market, Stanyon taught the change in //​[[http://​askalexander.org/​display/​13139/​Stanyon+s+Serial+Lessons+in+Conjuring+In+21+Parts+1899+1910/​428|Stanyon'​s Serial Lessons in Conjuring]]//,​ No. 20, July 1910, p. 5, but did not mention ​Cloyes, ​claiming ​the sleight ​to be his own invention. What is damning to Stanyon'​s claim is that he called it "A New Colour Change"​ in the lesson itself, but slipped in calling ​it "​Cloye'​s Colour Change"​ in the advertising for the lesson (see //​[[http://​askalexander.org/​display/​16725/​Stanyon+s+Magic+Vol+10+No+10/​8|Magic]]//,​ Vol. 10 No. 10, July 1910, p. 80).
  
 Stanley Collins later contributed an ungimmicked version to //​[[http://​askalexander.org/​display/​10745/​The+magician+monthly/​103|Magician Monthly]]//,​ Vol. 8 No. 6, May 1912, p. 90. There it is titled "​Original Colour Change"​. He later submitted a clearer explanation of it to //​Pentagram//,​ Vol. 1 No. 10, July 1947, p. 70, calling it the "Paint Brush Colour Change"​. In his handling, the rear card of the pack is stolen behind a Joker that lies on the front of the deck, to create a double card, which is then passed over the face of the pack and the rear card is left behind to effect the change. Stanley Collins later contributed an ungimmicked version to //​[[http://​askalexander.org/​display/​10745/​The+magician+monthly/​103|Magician Monthly]]//,​ Vol. 8 No. 6, May 1912, p. 90. There it is titled "​Original Colour Change"​. He later submitted a clearer explanation of it to //​Pentagram//,​ Vol. 1 No. 10, July 1947, p. 70, calling it the "Paint Brush Colour Change"​. In his handling, the rear card of the pack is stolen behind a Joker that lies on the front of the deck, to create a double card, which is then passed over the face of the pack and the rear card is left behind to effect the change.
Line 11: Line 11:
 The version of the change that has long been the common handling, in which two cards are gripped as one at their inner ends before brushing them across the top of the deck, was published by Frank Holmes as "The Brush Colour-Change"​ in //​[[http://​askalexander.org/​display/​15520/​Magical+World+New+Series+Vol+01+No+05/​11|The Magical World (New Series)]]//,​ No. 5, July 2 1913, p. 75. Holmes claimed it was "​only...slightly different from others."​ The version of the change that has long been the common handling, in which two cards are gripped as one at their inner ends before brushing them across the top of the deck, was published by Frank Holmes as "The Brush Colour-Change"​ in //​[[http://​askalexander.org/​display/​15520/​Magical+World+New+Series+Vol+01+No+05/​11|The Magical World (New Series)]]//,​ No. 5, July 2 1913, p. 75. Holmes claimed it was "​only...slightly different from others."​
  
-Two versions of this color-change ​principle ​are given in Glenn Gravatt'​s //​[[http://​askalexander.org/​display/​17459/​Encyclopedia+of+Self+Working+Card+Tricks/​399|Encyclopedia of Self Working Card Tricks]]//, 1936, p. 393. Gravatt gives no attribution,​ but Jean Hugard, in his revision of Gravatt'​s book, repeats the second version and credits it to Jack Merlin (p. 341). These handlings involve a triple card, with cards preset face down and face up, which are drawn from the bottom of the deck as a single card and are brushed over the face-up top card to effect the transformation.+Two versions of this color-change are given in Glenn Gravatt'​s //​[[http://​askalexander.org/​display/​17459/​Encyclopedia+of+Self+Working+Card+Tricks/​399|Encyclopedia of Self Working Card Tricks]]//, 1936, p. 393. Gravatt gives no attribution,​ but Jean Hugard, in his revision of Gravatt'​s book, repeats the second version and credits it to Jack Merlin (p. 341). These handlings involve a triple card, with cards preset face down and face up, which are drawn from the bottom of the deck as a single card and are brushed over the face-up top card to effect the transformation.
  
-Dai Vernonin his "​Ambitious Card" routine from //​[[http://​askalexander.org/​display/​18141/​Stars+of+Magic/​79|Stars of Magic]]//, Series 5 No. 2, 1949, p. 77 of the 1960 compilation book, uses what is essentially a reverse paintbrush changeThe effect is the same, but it is accomplished by pushing a single card forward, and pulling a double card back. And to add yet one more name to the list of people claiming ownership, Jeff Busby credits the move to Neal Elias in //Arcane//, No. 14, 1995, p. 203. Busby gives no citation for this attribution,​ but it's clear that it couldn'​t have been before Cloyes ​due to the timeframe involved.+Another variant is described by Walter Gibson in //​[[https://​askalexander.org/​display/​38626/​The+Sphinx/​16|The Sphinx]]//, Vol. 17 No. 11, Jan. 1919, p. 216. It uses an inverted technique: Instead of passing a double card over the deck and coming away with a single card, the performer passes a single card over the deck and comes away with a double card. Gibson opines that this method of stealing a card to effect a change is inferior to that of depositing a card to accomplish the same result. Nevertheless, ​Dai Vernon ​used this inverse technique ​in his "​Ambitious Card" routine from //​[[http://​askalexander.org/​display/​18141/​Stars+of+Magic/​79|Stars of Magic]]//, Series 5 No. 2, 1949, p. 77 of the 1960 compilation book. 
 + 
 +To add yet one more name to the list of proposed inventors, Jeff Busby credits the move to Neal Elias in //Arcane//, No. 14, 1995, p. 203. Busby gives no citation for this attribution,​ but it's clear it couldn'​t have been before Cloyes, since Elias was born in 1921. 
 + 
 +A related change was developed around the same time as Cloyes'​s change. It, too, used a paintbrush action on the face of the deck, but the method ​to accomplish ​the change was entirely different. It was published by M. F. Crowe as "The Artist Card" in //​[[https://​askalexander.org/​display/​38179/​The+Sphinx/​15|The Sphinx]]//, Vol. 9 No. 5, Oct. 1910, p. 175.
  
 {{tag>​technique}} {{tag>​technique}}