Conjuring Credits

The Origins of Wonder

User Tools

Site Tools


Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
mental:confabulation [2016/10/12 19:46]
stephenminch
mental:confabulation [2020/05/21 09:04] (current)
denisbehr category link added
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 The starting point of the multiple-prediction effect best known as "Confabulation" (named after a version of it by Alan Shaxon) would seem to be "Mental Projection Extraordinary" in //[[http://askalexander.org/display/23257/The+Life+and+Mysteries+of+the+Celebrated+Dr+Q/95|The Life and Mysteries of the Celebrated Dr. Q]]// by Alexander (stage name of Claude Conlin), 1921, p. 93. Two methods are given. The first involves a carbon impression inside an envelope; the second uses pocket writing. The starting point of the multiple-prediction effect best known as "Confabulation" (named after a version of it by Alan Shaxon) would seem to be "Mental Projection Extraordinary" in //[[http://askalexander.org/display/23257/The+Life+and+Mysteries+of+the+Celebrated+Dr+Q/95|The Life and Mysteries of the Celebrated Dr. Q]]// by Alexander (stage name of Claude Conlin), 1921, p. 93. Two methods are given. The first involves a carbon impression inside an envelope; the second uses pocket writing.
 +
 +In 1938, Earl Rybolt published a related effect with a similar title, "Rybolt's Miracle Thought Projection", which he claimed to have been performing for fifteen years, which would date it to 1923, two years after the Dr. Q book was published. Rybolt's method involved an off-stage assistant, who wrote down spectators' free choices, which were delivered onstage for a switch. See //[[https://askalexander.org/display/38393/The+Sphinx/8|The Sphinx]]//, Vol. 37 No. 6, Aug. 1938, p. 140.
  
 Stewart James made a significant advance in method with his “Perfect Prediction” in //[[http://askalexander.org/display/38571/The+Sphinx/20|The Sphinx]]//, Vol. 28 No. 4, June 1929, p. 140, which utilized double writing and loading of the prediction into a sealed envelope or nest of envelopes, using the load tube from the old "Ball of Wool" trick. Stewart James made a significant advance in method with his “Perfect Prediction” in //[[http://askalexander.org/display/38571/The+Sphinx/20|The Sphinx]]//, Vol. 28 No. 4, June 1929, p. 140, which utilized double writing and loading of the prediction into a sealed envelope or nest of envelopes, using the load tube from the old "Ball of Wool" trick.
Line 7: Line 9:
 Shortly after this James item appeared, Theodore Annemann published "A Prophecy of the Koran" in //[[http://askalexander.org/display/14400/The+Book+Without+a+Name/58|The Book without a Name]]//, 1931, p. 58. His approach involves a switch of the card sealed inside an envelope. Shortly after this James item appeared, Theodore Annemann published "A Prophecy of the Koran" in //[[http://askalexander.org/display/14400/The+Book+Without+a+Name/58|The Book without a Name]]//, 1931, p. 58. His approach involves a switch of the card sealed inside an envelope.
  
-James returned to the trick, essentially repeating his method from //The Sphinx//, in an article, "Two Fearless Feats" (the first trick of which was later retitled “The Ball of Fortune”), in //[[http://askalexander.org/display/15792/Jinx+No+098|The Jinx]]//, No. 98, June 1940, p. 601. His method is the same, but the prediction is loaded into a ball of wool instead of an envelope, returning the loading tube to its original home.+Tom Sellers was the next to submit a routine and method for the premise: "Prediction Extraordinary" in //[[https://askalexander.org/display/38335/The+Sphinx/5|The Sphinx]]//, Vol. 34 No. 8, Oct. 1935, p. 209. 
 + 
 +Stewart James returned to the trick, essentially repeating his method from //The Sphinx//, in an article, "Two Fearless Feats" (the first trick of which was later retitled “The Ball of Fortune”), in //[[http://askalexander.org/display/15792/Jinx+No+098|The Jinx]]//, No. 98, June 1940, p. 601. His method is the same, but the prediction is loaded into a ball of wool instead of an envelope, returning the loading tube to its original home.
  
 Though he cites no precedents, William S. Houghton embellished on Annemann's structure and applied some of James's thinking in "'Prediction Supreme' Routine," in //[[http://askalexander.org/display/38727/The+Magic+36/23|The Magic 36]]//, 1943, p. 21. Double writing is added to Annemann's card-in-envelope switch. Though he cites no precedents, William S. Houghton embellished on Annemann's structure and applied some of James's thinking in "'Prediction Supreme' Routine," in //[[http://askalexander.org/display/38727/The+Magic+36/23|The Magic 36]]//, 1943, p. 21. Double writing is added to Annemann's card-in-envelope switch.
Line 17: Line 21:
 Specifically inspired by Grimmond's "Triple Forecast", Alan Shaxon developed “Confabulation” in the 1960s, and later marketed it through Ken Brooke in 1970. Specifically inspired by Grimmond's "Triple Forecast", Alan Shaxon developed “Confabulation” in the 1960s, and later marketed it through Ken Brooke in 1970.
  
-(This history courtesy of Max Maven.)+(This history courtesy of Max Maven, with an added citation by Yaniv Deautsch.) 
 + 
 +  * [[https://www.conjuringarchive.com/list/category/2177|Category in Denis Behr's "Conjuring Archive"]]
  
 {{tag>effect}} {{tag>effect}}